Radiation exposure chart admits cancer radiotherapy delivers fatal dose to patients
Thanks to the Fukushima catastrophe, we've all been learning a lot about the laws of physics lately -- especially about radiation. To help explain it all, the folks over at InformationIsBeautiful.com have created a radiation explanation chart that shows the relative levels of harm from various doses of radiation (link below). The InformationIsBeautiful website is pretty cool. The folks there specialize in making complex data visually interesting. I've admired some of their work for quite some time. So I was checking out their new "Radiation Dosage Chart" which explained all the effects of receiving radiation doses of various levels. The chart revealed things like: • 100 mSv Annual dose at which increased lifetime cancer risk if evident • 250 mSv Dose limit for US radiation workers in life-saving operations • 1,000 mSv Temporary radiation sickness. Nausea, low blood count. Not fatal. ... and so on.
As I read down the chart, things got really interesting.
• 2,000 mSv Severe radiation poisoning • 4,000 mSv Extremely severe dose - survival possible • 5,000 mSv Extremely severe radiation dose - high chance of fatality • 6,000 mSv Usually fatal dose • 10,000 mSv Fatal dose And then, right there on the chart, the very next line was a huge eye-opener, because it said: • 20,000 mSv Highly targeted dose used in cancer radiotherapy
Cancer radiotherapy dose is fatal?Okay, so wait a minute. A dose of 10,000 is fatal, yet the cancer industry uses twice that dose to "treat" cancer? I knew cancer radiation treatments were barbaric, but I never knew they were twice the amount considered absolutely fatal.This outcome was so intriguing that I took a screen capture of the chart.
The next day, I went back to the InformationIsBeautiful.net website to make sure I really saw what I thought I saw. After all, if cancer radiotherapy is being given at 20,000 mSv, that's a pretty big story, especially in light of the Fukushima fallout and the increasing radiation burden on populations everywhere. So I brought up the website, and guess what? The 20,000 mSv cancer radiotherapy line had been removed from the chart.
You can now see this for yourself at the InformationIsBeautiful website:
Notice anything missing? The 20,000 mSv line has been removed. It now jumps from 10,000 to 30,000. Jokingly stated, it seems that the Information Is Beautiful website might now appear to be the Information Is Missing website.
Cancer industry influence?
So how do you think this line about 20,000 mSv in cancer radiotherapy got removed? I suppose there are a number of possible explanations for it. One particularly conspiratorial explanation is that someone from the cancer industry probably asked them to remove it. The cancer industry, after all, doesn't want people knowing the simple truth that cancer radiotherapy involves a fatal dose of radiation. And no industry operates with more secrecy than the cancer industry, it seems, with all its cover-ups about the dangers of chemotherapy and its continued suppression of the truth about vitamin D and its cancer preventive effects. Then again, the InformationIsBeautiful website has actually done a fantastic job of producing information about Vitamin D and sunlight exposure. This is precisely the kind of information the cancer industry doesn't want people to see
(Pretty cool chart, eh?) Just to give these folks a chance to explain all this, I sent off an email to David at the InformationIsBeautiful website asking them to clarify why they pulled the cancer radiotherapy information off their radiation dosage chart. Perhaps there's a completely innocent explanation for it, I thought, and I want to know the real story here. The email I received in return was a polite response with a collection of frequently asked questions and answers. I don't blame the guys there for using this -- they're probably incredibly busy these days -- but I was intrigued by one of the answers in the email itself: It said that the InformationIsBeautiful team has "done commercial work for GE, the BBC, Google and many others." And who is GE? They are, of course, one of the world's top manufacturers of radiotherapy equipment! You can see an example of their radiotherapy machines at http://radiologynews.gehealthcare.com/en/com...
So now we have the Information Is Beautiful team pulling the "cancer radiotherapy" line out of their chart, then admitting they are a paid client of General Electric, a top manufacturer of radiotherapy equipment. None of this proves anything, of course, but it probably raises a few eyebrows. Is there a financial conflict of interest at work here? Personally, I like their website a lot, and I'm a fan of their charts. So I don't want to think they might be engaged in some sort of intentional censoring of their chart data just to protect the cancer industry. But I've seen stranger stuff happen, for sure...
( Read More )