UPDATE: FAA declared a "national defense airspace" over part of Lake Michigan...and other updates

by: Linda Kirby/WGON

Maria Bartiromo said that there were US parts in the first balloon that was shot down over SC. Of course, since the world shares manufacturing of everything, nothing is made in America anymore only in China for the most part. So, that doesn’t surprise me there are US parts written in English on that first balloon.

Or, could those parts be from our own balloon and this is all a false flag? Keep reading.

That first balloon snapped images of our military sites as it flew over our country.

Bloomberg reports: “China Spots Unidentified Object Flying Near Port City: Paper” Is this a lie? Is this to make everyone think we are doing the same thing? Are we? Too many questions with no answers.

“Someone is learning a lot about US-Canadian response to intrusion of air space, response time, air base assigned to respond, type of aircraft to respond, radar tracking and identification time, probably search radar frequencies, definitely fire control radar terminal guidance frequency and duration of the terminal guidance phase, communication and decision making protocols before interceptor dispatch, same for authorization for a kill shot. All that for the price of a balloon or UAV. Someone is getting quite a bargain.” was a comment on one of the articles, and frankly, with all the secrecy, I tend to have to agree with this commenter.

Fox news: “Both 'objects' shot down over Alaska, Canada believed to be balloons, US says” Take note of the term used “believed” to be a balloon. Now, if they can’t tell it was a balloon before they even shot it down, then there’s something very wrong with our military and with NORAD. First they use an ambiguous term like “object” and now they are not sure if it’s a balloon? What is going on here, really?

I know we have probably been in WWIII for quite some time now. Could this be an escalation? Or, could this be China trying to get a lot of details before they strike us? All this ambiguous terminology sure makes one wonder.

Fox reports: “The Federal Aviation Administration has declared a "national defense airspace" over part of Lake Michigan, the organization announced Sunday.” Now, hours later, that airspace has been reopened. So, does this mean there really was a 4th “object”?

Rep. Matt Rosendale, R-Mont., released a statement on Twitter saying that NORTHCOM believes there is an object above the state that is not an anomaly.

"I am in constant communication with NORCOM [sic] and they have just advised me that they have confidence there IS an object and it WAS NOT an anomaly. I am waiting now to receive visual confirmation. Our nation’s security is my priority," he wrote Sunday. Reports Fox.

There are those who have grown tired of all the “truthers” and the “conspiracy theorists” and say all this has been said over and over for years but it’s just a way to keep you fearful and nothing will happen. Well, that might be true. However, we do live in the end times where there will be many terrible things happen. God has taken his grace from us in the US for our sins so expect just about anything. I recall the bible said God will take his hand off and let the enemy take over. Is this what we are seeing here? Or is this a false flag event as some believe. They think these balloons are ours to take our eyes off of what is really going on. So, what is really going on that the USis willing to sacrifice million dollar balloons? Or were there ever balloons other than that first one? After all, that balloon flew lower than they said because it could be seen with the naked eye. Why if it was covert? Could it have been that the balloon was meant to be seen? Could this be all about Taiwan? Is China getting soiled very badly with our public that when the US is ready to defend Taiwan against China, the public will be fine with it, just like they did with Russia and Ukraine? These are the things that are being considered by many. I don’t know what’s going on for real. I’m in the business of informing you with what is being reported, not to make you think what I think. You read and watch the news and decide for yourself but I must think there’s more than meets the eye here.